May 19, 2020

GM Announces Recall to Fix Chevy Volt Fire Risk

General Motors
Bizclik Editor
2 min
GM Announces Recall to Fix Chevy Volt Fire Risk


General Motors has decided to recall its Chevrolet Volt hybrid in order to eliminate the possibility that its batteries might catch fire after serious side-impact crashes.

The company says it will improve the vehicle’s structure and battery-coolant system in response to a series of tests conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that we told you about in early November.

NHTSA determined that punctures to the vehicle’s battery pack caused a coolant leak, which created short circuit fires hours and weeks after the tests.

GM says the battery itself is safe, and is avoiding using the word “recall” by calling this a “customer satisfaction campaign” to “provide peace of mind to customers.”

See Related Stories from Business Review USA:

Lithium Batteries Causing Cars to Catch Fire

White House Says Taxpayers Could Lose $14B with Bailout

General Motors Posts $3.2 Billion Profit in 2011

Chrysler Turns Profit Two Years after Bankruptcy Filing

“The Volt has always been safe to drive,” said GM Vice President for Global Product Development Mary Barra in a statement on the GM website. “Now, we will go the extra mile to ensure our customers’ peace of mind in the days and weeks following a severe crash.”

According to GM, the modifications will:

-Strengthen an existing portion of the Volt’s vehicle safety structure to further protect the battery pack in a severe side collision

-Add a sensor in the reservoir of the battery coolant system to monitor coolant levels

-Add a tamper-resistant bracket to the top of the battery coolant reservoir to help prevent potential coolant overfill

The company asks all 8,000 owners of the Chevy Volt to return the vehicles to dealerships to have the changes made. All future Volts will be manufactured with the changes.

Overall, the Volt has received high crash test scores from the NHTSA and the agency says that no post-crash fires have been reported in real-world situations.

Share article

Jun 12, 2021

How changing your company's software code can prevent bias

Lisa Roberts, Senior Director ...
3 min
Removing biased terminology from software can help organisations create a more inclusive culture, argues Lisa Roberts, Senior Director of HR at Deltek

Two-third of tech professionals believe organizations aren’t doing enough to address racial inequality. After all, many companies will just hire a DEI consultant, have a few training sessions and call it a day. 

Wanting to take a unique yet impactful approach to DEI, Deltek, the leading global provider of software and solutions for project-based businesses, took a look at  and removed all exclusive terminology in their software code. By removing terms such as ‘master’ and ‘blacklist’ from company coding, Deltek is working to ensure that diversity and inclusion are woven into every aspect of their organization. 

Business Chief North America talks to Lisa Roberts, Senior Director of HR and Leader of Diversity & Inclusion at Deltek to find out more.

Why should businesses today care about removing company bias within their software code?  

We know that words can have a profound impact on people and leave a lasting impression. Many of the words that have been used in a technology environment were created many years ago, and today those words can be harmful to our customers and employees. Businesses should use words that will leave a positive impact and help create a more inclusive culture in their organization

What impact can exclusive terms have on employees? 

Exclusive terms can have a significant impact on employees. It starts with the words we use in our job postings to describe the responsibilities in the position and of course, we also see this in our software code and other areas of the business. Exclusive terminology can be hurtful, and even make employees feel unwelcome. That can impact a person’s desire to join the team, stay at a company, or ultimately decide to leave. All of these critical actions impact the bottom line to the organization.    

Please explain how Deltek has removed bias terminology from its software code

Deltek’s engineering team has removed biased terminology from our products, as well as from our documentation. The terms we focused on first that were easy to identify include blacklist, whitelist, and master/slave relationships in data architecture. We have also made some progress in removing gendered language, such as changing he and she to they in some documentation, as well as heteronormative language. We see this most commonly in pick lists that ask to identify someone as your husband or wife. The work is not done, but we are proud of how far we’ve come with this exercise!

What steps is Deltek taking to ensure biased terminology doesn’t end up in its code in the future?

What we are doing at Deltek, and what other organizations can do, is to put accountability on employees to recognize when this is happening – if you see something, say something! We also listen to feedback our customers give us and have heard their feedback on this topic. Those are both very reactive things of course, but we are also proactive. We have created guidance that identifies words that are more inclusive and also just good practice for communicating in a way that includes and respects others.

What advice would you give to other HR leaders who are looking to enhance DEI efforts within company technology? 

My simple advice is to start with what makes sense to your organization and culture. Doing nothing is worse than doing something. And one of the best places to start is by acknowledging this is not just an HR initiative. Every employee owns the success of D&I efforts, and employees want to help the organization be better. For example, removing bias terminology was an action initiated by our Engineering and Product Strategy teams at Deltek, not HR. You can solicit the voices of employees by asking for feedback in engagement surveys, focus groups, and town halls. We hear great recommendations from employees and take those opportunities to improve. 


Share article