May 19, 2020

How to think about computers in the 21st century

Consumer Electronics Show
Thalmic Labs
Stephen Lake
Thalmic Labs
Stephen Lake, Thalmic Labs
3 min
How to think about computers in the 21st century

Computers are everywhere. In toasters, washing machines, refrigerators, cars, and thermostats (to name an arbitrary few). At last year's Consumer Electronics Show (CES) - Mecca for tech geeks - Intel CEO Brian Krzanich showed off ‘Curie’; a computer so small he wore it as a suit button on stage.

We live in a world of ubiquitous computers. But right now, the way we interact with them is so awkward that people question their very utility.

As UX/UI design guru Golden Krishna describes the modern connected oven: “We slap a seven inch, Android-powered touchscreen on it so you can watch YouTube while you bake cookies.”

The problem here is a failure of metaphor. We think about the ‘computer’ inside the oven like a desktop computer. We know that, to talk to it, it needs a few basic ingredients: a screen, some kind of desktop and - of course - a QWERTY keyboard. To change how we interact with these new forms of computers, we have to change how we think about computing itself.

What if, when you thought about using your computer at home, the thing that jumped to mind wasn’t the familiar setup: screen, keyboard, pointer, and processor. What if it was just your home itself? Many interconnected pieces that you could control simply and easily from wherever you are.

Your screen could exist anywhere, at your whim, and vanish when you didn’t need it. The way you interact with that screen - to start a movie, launch a gaming application, or browse news and weather - could be the same as how you interact with your oven, microwave, and refrigerator.

Walking around, your house changes what part of the computer you talk to, and you control everything effortlessly with natural, intuitive inputs. The same could be true for shared screens in public places.

What will it take to get there? A few ingredients:

  1. Computers so small we forget we’re wearing them.
  2. Computers aware of our context: where we are and what we’re doing, so they can better understand what we intend without us having to tell them.
  3. Natural inputs that let us control technology the way we control everything else.
  4. A new metaphor to help us understand this new form of computing.

All of these ingredients exist today, save the last one.

We have wearable computers now, and they’re getting both more fashionable, more popular, and smaller. We have contextually-aware systems, like Google Now and Siri, designed to give us information we need without us having to ask.

We have a growing ecosystem of natural controllers; gesture control inputs like the Myo armband that read our muscles, voice control inputs that get more robust each year, and truly exotic inputs like the Muse headband designed to translate brainwaves into technology inputs.

Right now, we’re reaching a point where today’s technology has not yet realized its potential. Researchers have created a suite of astonishing technologies that break computing out of the old paradigm and release it into the air. Computers are all around us and connected, enabling interactions that would have been unimaginable in the heyday of the GUI.

What hasn’t caught up is our metaphor. We’re stuck in the office, thinking about computers in a way that limits their capability.

Follow @BizReviewCANADA

Read the July 2016 issue of Business Review USA & Canada magazine

Share article

Jun 12, 2021

How changing your company's software code can prevent bias

Lisa Roberts, Senior Director ...
3 min
Removing biased terminology from software can help organisations create a more inclusive culture, argues Lisa Roberts, Senior Director of HR at Deltek

Two-third of tech professionals believe organizations aren’t doing enough to address racial inequality. After all, many companies will just hire a DEI consultant, have a few training sessions and call it a day. 

Wanting to take a unique yet impactful approach to DEI, Deltek, the leading global provider of software and solutions for project-based businesses, took a look at  and removed all exclusive terminology in their software code. By removing terms such as ‘master’ and ‘blacklist’ from company coding, Deltek is working to ensure that diversity and inclusion are woven into every aspect of their organization. 

Business Chief North America talks to Lisa Roberts, Senior Director of HR and Leader of Diversity & Inclusion at Deltek to find out more.

Why should businesses today care about removing company bias within their software code?  

We know that words can have a profound impact on people and leave a lasting impression. Many of the words that have been used in a technology environment were created many years ago, and today those words can be harmful to our customers and employees. Businesses should use words that will leave a positive impact and help create a more inclusive culture in their organization

What impact can exclusive terms have on employees? 

Exclusive terms can have a significant impact on employees. It starts with the words we use in our job postings to describe the responsibilities in the position and of course, we also see this in our software code and other areas of the business. Exclusive terminology can be hurtful, and even make employees feel unwelcome. That can impact a person’s desire to join the team, stay at a company, or ultimately decide to leave. All of these critical actions impact the bottom line to the organization.    

Please explain how Deltek has removed bias terminology from its software code

Deltek’s engineering team has removed biased terminology from our products, as well as from our documentation. The terms we focused on first that were easy to identify include blacklist, whitelist, and master/slave relationships in data architecture. We have also made some progress in removing gendered language, such as changing he and she to they in some documentation, as well as heteronormative language. We see this most commonly in pick lists that ask to identify someone as your husband or wife. The work is not done, but we are proud of how far we’ve come with this exercise!

What steps is Deltek taking to ensure biased terminology doesn’t end up in its code in the future?

What we are doing at Deltek, and what other organizations can do, is to put accountability on employees to recognize when this is happening – if you see something, say something! We also listen to feedback our customers give us and have heard their feedback on this topic. Those are both very reactive things of course, but we are also proactive. We have created guidance that identifies words that are more inclusive and also just good practice for communicating in a way that includes and respects others.

What advice would you give to other HR leaders who are looking to enhance DEI efforts within company technology? 

My simple advice is to start with what makes sense to your organization and culture. Doing nothing is worse than doing something. And one of the best places to start is by acknowledging this is not just an HR initiative. Every employee owns the success of D&I efforts, and employees want to help the organization be better. For example, removing bias terminology was an action initiated by our Engineering and Product Strategy teams at Deltek, not HR. You can solicit the voices of employees by asking for feedback in engagement surveys, focus groups, and town halls. We hear great recommendations from employees and take those opportunities to improve. 


Share article